My experience with Luminar must be something akin to a
soccer “mom”, who sets out with excitement and pride, rooting from the
sidelines, only to find her little darling is not only no bloody good at the
game, but resorts to the foulest of tactics in order to keep others from
realising the fact.
Billed arrogantly as “one of the world’s leading investment
companies”, Luxembourg-domiciled Luminar claims a “unique” means of acquiring
businesses. Allegedly underpinned with
an “insurance” product that safeguards any deferred consideration (AKA the
money the seller waits for after the deal has been done), Luminar positions
itself as a cut above any other acquiring party.
Shockingly, the truth is far more sinister. The “insurance” product – if it even exists
anymore – can only be used in the most watertight deals. Even then, it is far from guaranteed that it
will pay out if required. We are aware
of at least one such deal dating back to 2008 where the former owner is still
fighting for their insurance money.
The “unique” acquisition method appears to comprise little
more than a combination of lending secured against the assets of the acquired
company and deferred consideration. Who
takes the majority of the financial risk?
The seller. Who takes no
financial risk whatsoever? Luminar.
Combine this with the franchise model – a particular
favourite of the Luminar shareholders – and we can begin to see the sheer
extent of the deception. Franchisees are
persuaded – by Ian David Johnson in the UK or James Russell Lowrie in Australia
– to part with a £100,000 licence fee and commit to a 5-year term paying
additional fees of £3,000 per month.
That is a total financial commitment of £280,000.
With the shakiest of “training” under their belt, they are
then expected to find, negotiate and conclude business acquisitions, on the
understanding that they will enjoy an equity stake in the acquired companies.
In its 4 years of operation, not a single deal has been
concluded. Of the 14 or so franchisees
that joined, just two remain – and many of those who have left have lost
six-figure sums.
Who has gained financially?
The Luminar shareholders of course – Ian David Johnson, James Russell
Lowrie and Stephen Gordon Greenwood.
No comments:
Post a Comment
We would appreciate your opinion on this blog and any article contained in it. If you choose to leave your comment, please refrain from using bad language, as such comments will be deleted. If you have information about Ian David Johnson or any of his associates, please email us or use the Contact Us form. Thank you!